How Does Writing Fit Into the 'Science of Reading'? - Education Week

Trending 2 weeks ago

In 1 sense, the nationalist speech astir what it volition instrumentality to marque definite each children go beardown readers has been wildly successful: States are passing authorities supporting evidence-based teaching approaches, and schoolhouse districts are rushing to proviso training. Publishers are under unit to driblet older materials. And for the archetypal clip successful years, an instructional issue—reading—is headlining acquisition media coverage.

In the mediate of each that, though, the absorption connected the “science of reading” has elided its duplicate constituent successful literacy instruction: writing.

Writing is intrinsically important for each students to learn—after all, it is the superior mode beyond code that humans communicate. But much than that, probe suggests that teaching students to constitute successful an integrated manner with speechmaking is not lone efficient, it’s effective.

Yet penning is often underplayed successful the simple grades. Too often, it is separated from schools’ speechmaking block. Writing is not assessed arsenic often arsenic reading, and principals, disquieted astir reading-exam scores, nonstop teachers to absorption connected 1 often astatine the disbursal of the other. Finally, beyond the English/language arts block, kids often aren’t asked to bash overmuch penning successful aboriginal grades.

“Sometimes, successful an early-literacy classroom, you’ll perceive a teacher say, ‘It’s clip to prime up your pencils,’” said Wiley Blevins, an writer and literacy advisor who provides grooming successful schools. “But your pencils should beryllium successful your manus astir the full morning.”

Strikingly, galore of the critiques that speechmaking researchers person made against the “balanced literacy” attack that has held sway successful schools for decades could arsenic use to penning instruction: Foundational penning skills—like phonics and connection structure—have not mostly been taught systematically oregon explicitly.

And similar the “find the main idea” strategies commonly taught successful speechmaking comprehension, penning acquisition has tended to absorption connected content-neutral tasks, alternatively than deepening students’ connections to the contented they learn.

Education Week wants to bring much attraction to these connections successful the stories that marque up this peculiar collection. But first, we privation to delve deeper into the lawsuit for including penning successful each measurement of the simple curriculum.

Why has penning been missing from the speechmaking conversation?

Much similar the assemblage of cognition connected however children larn to work words, it is besides settled subject that speechmaking and penning gully connected shared knowledge, adjacent though they person traditionally been segmented successful instruction.

“The assemblage of probe is important successful some fig of studies and prime of studies. There’s nary question that speechmaking and penning stock a batch of existent estate, they beryllium connected a batch of the aforesaid cognition and skills,” said Timothy Shanahan, an emeritus prof of acquisition astatine the University of Illinois Chicago. “Pick your spot: substance structure, vocabulary, sound-symbol relationships, ‘world knowledge.’”

The reasons for the bifurcation successful speechmaking and penning are legion. One is that the 2 fields person typically been studied separately. (Researchers studying penning usually didn’t analyse whether a penning intervention, for instance, besides aided students’ speechmaking abilities—and vice versa.)

Some scholars besides digit the dominance of the federally commissioned National Reading Panel report, which successful 2000 outlined cardinal instructional components of learning to read. The reappraisal didn’t analyse the transportation of penning to reading.

Looking adjacent further backmost yields insights, too. Penmanship and spelling were historically the lone parts of penning that were taught, and erstwhile penning reappeared successful the second fractional of the 20th century, it tended to absorption connected “process writing,” emphasizing idiosyncratic acquisition and communicative procreation implicit different genres. Only erstwhile the Common Core State Standards appeared successful 2010 did the accent displacement to penning astir nonfiction texts and crossed subjects—the thought that students should beryllium penning astir what they’ve learned.

And finally, teaching penning is hard. Few studies papers what mentation teachers person to thatch writing, but successful surveys, galore teachers say they received small training successful their assemblage acquisition courses. That’s astir apt wherefore lone a small implicit fractional of teachers, successful 1 2016 survey, said that they enjoyed teaching writing.

Writing should statesman successful the aboriginal grades

These factors each enactment against what is astir apt the astir important decision from the probe implicit the past fewer decades: Students successful the early-elementary grades request tons of varied opportunities to write.

“Students request enactment successful their writing,” said Dana Robertson, an subordinate prof of speechmaking and literacy acquisition astatine the schoolhouse of acquisition astatine Virginia Tech who besides studies however instructional alteration takes basal successful schools. “They request to beryllium taught explicitly the skills and strategies of penning and they request to spot the connections of reading, writing, and cognition development.”

While probe supports immoderate cardinal tenets of penning instruction—that it should beryllium structured, for instance, and impact drafting and revising—it hasn’t yet pointed to a circumstantial teaching look that works best.

One of the challenges, the researchers note, is that portion speechmaking curricula person improved implicit the years, they inactive don’t typically supply galore supports for students—or teachers, for that matter—for writing. Teachers often person to supplement with additions that don’t ever mesh good with their core, grade-level contented instruction.

“We person a batch of activities successful penning we cognize are good,” Shanahan said. “We don’t truly person a yearlong elementary-school-level program successful writing. That conscionable doesn’t beryllium the mode it does successful reading.”

Nevertheless, practitioners similar Blevins enactment penning into each speechmaking lesson, adjacent successful the earliest grades. And each the components that marque up a coagulated speechmaking programme tin beryllium enhanced done penning activities.

4 Key Things to Know About How Reading and Writing Interlock

Want a speedy summary of what probe tells america astir the instructional connections betwixt speechmaking and writing?

1. Reading and penning are intimately connected.


Research connected the connections began successful the aboriginal 1980s and has grown much robust with time.


Among the newest and astir important additions are 3 probe syntheses conducted by Steve Graham, a prof astatine the University of Arizona, and his probe partners. One of them examined whether penning acquisition besides led to improvements successful students’ speechmaking ability; a 2nd examined the inverse question. Both recovered important affirmative effects for speechmaking and writing.


A 3rd meta-analysis gets 1 measurement person to schoolroom instruction. Graham and partners examined 47 studies of instructional programs that balanced some speechmaking and writing—no programme could diagnostic much than 60 percent of 1 oregon the other. The results showed mostly affirmative effects connected some speechmaking and penning measures.


2. Writing matters adjacent astatine the earliest grades, erstwhile students are learning to read.


Studies amusement that the prewriting students bash successful aboriginal acquisition carries meaningful signals astir their decoding, spelling, and speechmaking comprehension aboriginal on. Reading experts accidental that students should beryllium supported successful penning astir arsenic soon arsenic they statesman reading, and grounds suggests that some spelling and handwriting are connected to the quality to link code to people and to oral connection development.


3. Like reading, penning indispensable beryllium taught explicitly.


Writing is simply a analyzable task that demands overmuch of students’ cognitive resources. Researchers mostly hold that penning indispensable beryllium explicitly taught—rather than near up to students to “figure out” the rules connected their own.


There isn’t arsenic overmuch probe astir however precisely to bash this. One 2019 review, successful fact, recovered important overlap among the twelve penning programs studied, and concluded that each showed signs of boosting learning. Debates abound astir the magnitude of operation students request and successful what sequence, specified arsenic whether they request to maestro condemnation operation earlier moving onto paragraphs and lengthier texts.


But successful general, students should beryllium guided connected however to conception sentences and paragraphs, and they should person entree to models and exemplars, the probe suggests. They besides request to recognize the iterative quality of writing, including however to draught and revise.


A fig of antithetic penning frameworks incorporating assorted degrees of operation and modeling are available, though astir of them person not been studied empirically.


4. Writing tin assistance students larn content—and marque consciousness of it.


Much of speechmaking comprehension depends connected helping students sorb “world knowledge”—think arts, past cultures, literature, and science—so that they tin marque consciousness of progressively blase texts and ideas arsenic their speechmaking improves. Writing tin heighten students’ contented learning, too, and should beryllium emphasized alternatively than taking a backmost spot to the much commonly taught stories and idiosyncratic reflections.


Graham and colleagues conducted different meta-analysis of astir 60 studies looking astatine this thought of “writing to learn” successful mathematics, science, and societal studies. The studies included a premix of higher-order assignments, similar analyses and argumentative writing, and lower-level ones, similar summarizing and explaining. The survey recovered that crossed each 3 disciplines, penning astir the contented improved pupil learning.

If students are doing enactment connected phonemic awareness—the quality to admit sounds—they shouldn’t simply manipulate sounds orally; they tin enactment them connected the leafage utilizing letters. If students are learning however to decode, they tin besides encode—record written letters and words portion they accidental the sounds retired loud.

And students tin constitute arsenic they statesman learning astir connection structure. Ewen When Blevins’ students are chiefly moving with decodable texts with controlled vocabularies, penning tin enactment their cognition astir however texts and narratives work: however sentences are enactment unneurotic and however they tin beryllium pulled isolated and reconstructed. Teachers tin punctual them successful these tasks, asking them to rephrase a condemnation arsenic a question, divided up 2 sentences, oregon harvester them.

“Young kids are penning these mile-long sentences that go 2nd nature. We acceptable a higher bar, and they are afloat susceptible of doing it. We tin demystify a spot immoderate of that analyzable substance if we make aboriginal connected however to speech astir sentences—how they’re created, however they’re joined,” Blevins said. “There are each these things you tin bash that are adjuvant to make an knowing of however sentences enactment and to get tons of practice.”

As students advancement done the simple grades, this structured enactment grows much sophisticated. They request to beryllium taught some condemnation and paragraph structure, and they request to larn however antithetic penning purposes and genres—narrative, persuasive, analytical—demand antithetic approaches. Most of all, the probe indicates, students request opportunities to constitute astatine magnitude often.

Using penning to enactment students’ exploration of content

Reading is acold much than foundational skills, of course. It means introducing students to affluent contented and the specialized vocabulary successful each subject and past ensuring that they read, discuss, analyze, and constitute astir those ideas. The enactment to systematically physique students’ cognition begins successful the aboriginal grades and progresses passim their K-12 experience.

Here again, disposable grounds suggests that penning tin beryllium a utile instrumentality to assistance students explore, deepen, and gully connections successful this content. With the due supports, penning tin beryllium a method for students to retell and analyse what they’ve learned successful discussions of contented and lit passim the schoolhouse day—in summation to their originative writing.

This “writing to learn” attack request not hold for students to maestro foundational skills. In the K-2 grades especially, overmuch contented is learned done teacher read-alouds and speech that see much analyzable vocabulary and ideas than the texts students are susceptible of reading. But that should not preclude students from penning astir this content, experts say.

“We bash a read-aloud oregon a media portion and we constitute astir what we learned. It’s conscionable a portion of however you’re responding, oregon sharing, what you’ve learned crossed texts; it’s not a abstracted happening from reading,” Blevins said. “If I americium doing read-alouds connected a concept—on carnal habitats, for example—my decodable texts volition beryllium connected animals. And students are capable to see immoderate of these much blase ideas and connection successful their writing, due to the fact that we’ve elevated the conversations astir these texts.”

In this acceptable of stories, Education Week examines the connections betwixt elementary-level speechmaking and penning successful 3 areas—encoding, language and substance structure, and content-area learning. But determination are truthful galore much examples.

Please constitute america to stock yours erstwhile you’ve finished.

Stephen Sawchuk is an adjunct managing exertion for Education Week, starring sum of teaching, learning, and curriculum.

Want to work much astir the probe that informed this story? Here’s a bibliography to commencement you off.

Berninger V. W., Abbott, R. D., Abbott, S. P., Graham S., & Richards T. (2002). Writing and reading: Connections betwixt connection by manus and connection by eye. Journal of Learning Disabilities. Special Issue: The Language of Written Language, 35(1), 39–56
Berninger, Virginia, Robert D. Abbott, Janine Jones, Beverly J. Wolf, Laura Gould, Marci Anderson-Younstrom, Shirley Shimada, Kenn Apel. (2006) “Early improvement of connection by hand: composing, reading, listening, and speaking connections; 3 letter-writing modes; and accelerated mapping successful spelling.” Developmental Neuropsychology, 29(1), pp. 61-92
Cabell, Sonia Q, Laura S. Tortorelli, and Hope K. Gerde (2013). “How Do I Write…? Scaffolding Preschoolers’ Early Writing Skills.” The Reading Teacher, 66(8), pp. 650-659.
Gerde, H.K., Bingham, G.E. & Wasik, B.A. (2012). “Writing successful Early Childhood Classrooms: Guidance for Best Practices.” Early Childhood Education Journal 40, 351–359 (2012)
Gilbert, Jennifer, and Steve Graham. (2010). “Teaching Writing to Elementary Students successful Grades 4–6: A National Survey.” The Elementary School Journal 110(44)
Graham, Steve, et al. (2017). “Effectiveness of Literacy Programs Balancing Reading and Writing Instruction: A Meta-Analysis.” Reading Research Quarterly, 53(3) pp. 279–304
Graham, Steve, and Michael Hebert. (2011). “Writing to Read: A Meta-Analysis of the Impact of Writing and Writing Instruction connected Reading.” Harvard Educational Review (2011) 81(4): 710–744.
Graham, Steve. (2020). “The Sciences of Reading and Writing Must Become More Fully Integrated.” Reading Research Quarterly, 55(S1) pp. S35–S44
Graham, Steve, Sharlene A. Kiuhara, and Meade MacKay. (2020).”The Effects of Writing connected Learning successful Science, Social Studies, and Mathematics: A Meta-Analysis.” Review of Educational Research April 2020, Vol 90, No. 2, pp. 179–226
Shanahan, Timothy. “History of Writing and Reading Connections.” successful Shanahan, Timothy. (2016). “Relationships betwixt speechmaking and penning development.” In C. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of penning probe (2nd ed., pp. 194–207). New York, NY: Guilford.
Slavin, Robert, Lake, C., Inns, A., Baye, A., Dachet, D., & Haslam, J. (2019). “A quantitative synthesis of probe connected penning approaches successful grades 2 to 12.” London: Education Endowment Foundation.
Troia, Gary. (2014). Evidence-based practices for penning acquisition (Document No. IC-5). Retrieved from University of Florida, Collaboration for Effective Educator, Development, Accountability, and Reform Center website: http://ceedar.education.ufl.edu/tools/innovation-configuration/
Troia, Gary, and Steve Graham. (2016).“Common Core Writing and Language Standards and Aligned State Assessments: A National Survey of Teacher Beliefs and Attitudes.” Reading and Writing 29(9).

Top